The XPS 17 enjoys the now-iconic XPS design, with a silver aluminum lid and bottom chassis and black carbon fiber lining the keyboard deck. The aesthetic is streamlined and modern, with tiny display bezels creating the impression that the display is floating in air. It’s one of the best-looking laptops on the market today without being ostentatious. It’s also incredibly well built, with no bending, flexing, or twisting in the lid, keyboard deck, or chassis, and the hinge is smooth while holding the display firmly in place. Dell paid attention to the little details in designing the XPS 17, and it shows.

We reviewed the XPS 17 with a 45-watt, a 14-core (six Performance and eight Efficient), 20-thread Intel Core i7-12700H CPU. The Blade 17 we reviewed used the Core i7-12800H, a slightly faster version of the same chip with a max Turbo frequency of 4.8GHz versus 4.7GHz. The XPS 17 can be upgraded to the overclockable Core i9-12900HK, while the Blade 17 goes up to the non-overclockable Core i9-12900H.

According to our benchmarks, these two machines were evenly matched in CPU-intensive tasks. The XPS 17 was faster in Geekbench 5 multi-core but slower in single-core, while that was reversed in Cinebench R23. The laptops completed our Handbrake test that encodes a 420MB video as H.265 within a second of each other. Both laptops have thin chassis and demonstrated some thermal throttling, which likely accounts for the similarity in their performance on these benchmarks, despite the differing CPUs.

In the Pugetbench Premiere Pro benchmark that runs in a live version of Adobe Premiere Pro, the Blade 17 benefitted from its much faster Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti versus the XPS 17’s RTX 3060. Premiere Pro heavily uses the GPU for rendering and other tasks, and it’s no surprise that the Blade 17 was the leader here. I’ll note that the XPS 17’s score jumped to 853 in its performance mode, which is excellent, considering the disparity.

As you might expect, the Blade 17 is the better gaming laptop with its RTX 3080 Ti that’s capable of 4K gaming at reasonable graphics settings. The XPS 17 can handle some titles at 1440p and medium graphics, but your best bet will be to stick with 1080p and then crank up the graphics.

The bottom line is that the XPS 17 and Blade 17 are evenly matched if your workflow involves mostly CPU-intensive tasks. If you’re a gamer or use GPU-dependent apps, then the Blade 17 has the advantage.

We tested the XPS 17’s UHD+ IPS display, one of the best IPS panels we’ve seen. It was incredibly bright at 543 nits, covered 100% of the AdobeRGB color gamut, and boasted a phenomenal accuracy of a DeltaE of 0.58 (1.0 or less is considered excellent). It also achieved a contrast ratio of 1,870:1, one of the best scores we’ve seen on an IPS display. Our review Blade 17 equipped a QHD display running at a superfast 240Hz. That makes it great for gaming, but its general display metrics were well below the XPS 17’s. Its colors were reasonably wide and very accurate, but its brightness was just average, and its contrast is below average for a premium laptop (we like to see at least 1,000:1).

We haven’t tested the other Blade 17 display options, but at least based on the panel we tested, the XPS 17 is by far the superior laptop for creators. In fact, the XPS 17 has the best display we’ve tested outside of OLED, QLED, and mini-LED, giving it a win in this category.

The XPS 17 is narrower and shallower than the Blade 17, thanks to its smaller display and tiny bezels. It’s almost equally thin at 0.77 inches versus 0.78 inches, and it’s noticeably lighter at 5.34 pounds versus 6.06 pounds. These laptops are large and heavy and will be a chore to lug around, but the XPS 17 has a meaningful advantage in size and weight.

Another XPS 17 advantage is in its battery life. It fell short of the average in our web browsing test that cycles through some popular and complex websites, but its 7.5 hours more than doubled the Blade 17’s performance on this test. In our video test that loops a local Full HD Avengers trailer, the XPS 17 was more than three times as efficient, lasting for a strong 13 hours.

The XPS 17 may not quite make it through a full day of productivity work, but it will last considerably longer on a charge than the Blade 17. Overall, it’s the more portable powerhouse.

The XPS 17 starts at $1,812 for a Core i5-12500H CPU, 8GB of DDR5 RAM, a 512GB PCIe 4.0 SSD, Intel UHD graphics, and a 17-inch Full HD+ display. It tops out at $3,625 when configured with a Core i9-12900HK, 64GB of DDR5 RAM, a 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD, an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060, and a 17-inch UHD+ display.

The Blade 17 entry-level is $2,700 for a Core i7-12800H, 16GB of DDR5 RAM, a 1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD, an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060, and a 17.3-inch QHD 165Hz display. At the high end, you’ll spend $4,300 for a Core i9-12900H, 32GB of DDR5 RAM, a 1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD, an RTX 3080 Ti, and a 17.3 UHD 144Hz display. The XPS 17 isn’t an inexpensive laptop, but the Blade 17 is even more costly.

For most buyers and all but the most demanding creators, the Dell XPS 17 is the better all-around laptop. It performs as well as the Razer Blade 17 at CPU-intensive tasks and is fast enough to handle typical creative workflows. it also has significantly better battery life. However, if you’re a gamer or very demanding creator, the more expensive Blade 17 offers more GPU power at the high end.

Editors’ Recommendations