The Envy 16 is an all-metal laptop with a minimalist design that’s attractive and appears contemporary. Its chassis and lid are rigid, with only a little bit of give in the keyboard deck. The Inspiron 16 Plus also has an external aluminum shell, but while its bottom chassis was rigid enough, the lid was quite flexible and there was LCD distortion with just a little bit of pressure. That and the plastic display bezels detract from a quality, premium feel. And it’s even more simply designed and not as attractive as the Envy.

The Envy 16 also enjoys a better keyboard, with large keycaps, excellent key spacing, and switches that have plenty of travel and a springy, precise feel. The Inspiron 16 Plus’s keyboard also had good key spacing and large keycaps, but its switches felt looser and less precise. Both laptops had similar mechanical touchpads with a comfortable feel and confident, quiet clicks.

We reviewed the Inspiron 16 Plus with the Intel Core i7-13700H, a 45-watt CPU with 14 cores (six Performance at 5.0GHz and eight Efficient at 3.7GHz) and 20 threads. That’s slower than the Core i9-13900H in the Envy 16 that we reviewed, which has Performance cores at up to 5.4GHz and Efficient cores at up to 4.1GHz. Both laptops had the same RTX 4060 GPU.

The Inspiron 16 Plus kept up with the Envy 16 in two of our CPU-intensive benchmarks while falling behind in the Cinebench R23 benchmark. The Envy 16 also was much faster in the PugetBench Premiere Pro benchmark, which runs in a live version of Adobe’s Premiere Pro and uses the GPU to speed up various processes.

The Envy 16 benefitted from a faster CPU but at a higher price. But for those who need the most power, at least the option is available from HP.

We reviewed both laptops with similar 16.0-inch 16:10 2.5K IPS displays running at up to 120Hz. Unsurprisingly, they demonstrated similar performance, with the Envy 16’s display being brighter and the Inspiron 16 Plus’s panel having a higher contrast ratio.

While these displays are similar, the Envy 16 benefits from a 2.8K OLED option that will provide much wider and more accurate colors and inky blacks. Again, it costs more, but these extras are the reason why.

Both laptops use four-speaker setups, two downward-firing and two upward-firing, to provide decent audio. They performed similarly, with enough volume and clear mids and highs. Like most laptops, both lacked in bass.

The laptops were almost identical in terms of being wide, deep, and thick, but the Inspiron 16 Plus was about half a pound lighter. Both will fill up a backpack, but the Dell will be a little easier to lug around.

Regarding battery life, the Inspiron 16 Plus lasted considerably longer than the Envy 16 in our web-browsing test. Oddly enough, it did worse in our video-looping test, which is unusual, closely matching the Envy. Neither laptop will get you through a full day’s work, but the Inspiron 16 Plus may last a bit longer.

The Inspiron 16 Plus is a bit overpriced given its flimsier build, and while it performs well, it can’t be configured much higher than our review unit. The Envy 16 starts at a lower price and is just slightly more expensive when similarly configured. But it offers a more robust and attractive feel.

The Envy 16 can also be configured with a faster processor and a much better OLED display. That gives it the edge, even if the best options do bump the price over $2,000. As is often the case, you get what you pay for.

If neither of these laptops work for you, make sure to check out some of our laptop roundups:

Editors’ Recommendations